MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C672B1.C2031E80" This document is a Single File Web Page, also known as a Web Archive file. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that supports Web Archive, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer. ------=_NextPart_01C672B1.C2031E80 Content-Location: file:///C:/A6734A27/SodomGomorrahSermonforCong.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
First Congregational
February 5, 2006
“For the Sake of 10”
Reverend Charlotte Asher
Scripture: Genesis 18:20-32, Micah 6:8
=
220;The Bible contains six admonishments to
homosexuals and 362 admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn’t mean that God
doesn’t love heterosexuals.
It’s just that they need more supervision.” - Lynn Lavner
I m=
ust say
that I am going to tackle a difficult subject in this morning’s
sermon. My message is a bit l=
onger
than a Communion Sunday message due to the subject matter.
Let=
us
pray.
O D=
ivine,
Lift up our souls – out of darkness into light, out of doubt into fai=
th,
out of fear into trust, out of despair into hope, out of indifference into
joy. Amen.
This
morning’s message is about thresholds; whether we cross them or not a=
nd
if we make it clear to others that we are crossing certain thresholds. It’s about understanding the=
full
impact of what it means for a church to be Open & Affirming and what it
means if we are not.
One=
of my
graduate professors asked us last Monday if there was any other profession
where anyone could walk in the door and be welcomed. She was talking to a group of educ=
ators
and educators to be. She said=
that
teachers, educate anyone that comes through their doors. Was there any other profession? They/we cannot just tell! Let me show you why.
In =
the just
last few weeks, in the newspaper here is what I have found. The murders of Gwen Arrajo, the
transgender teen in the
Som=
e of you
have been attending the worship services of The City of Refuge in
=
220;Religion
is the biggest obstacle for black gays and lesbians in accepting
themselves.” “Bla=
ck gay
men go to church and have ministers condemning them, beating up on them eve=
ry
week.” “You could=
have
a brother strung out on crack, an unmarried sister pregnant with her third
child and a cousin getting out of jail, but the gay person with a good job =
is
the one who is unacceptable.”
In =
another
article, a columnist was talking positively about “
Her=
e is
another; “It is really hard to believe that people like yourself are
gloating over this film and are so proud of the degradation of our country
(USA) that you have joined the masses and are HELL BENT on the destruction =
of
Christianity, family values, and everything that is decent and what our
forefathers have fought and died for in this country. Your kind are the real BIGOTS! You are the enemy of everything th=
at is
decent and good, you love death and destruction (that is what the homosexual
lifestyle will lead to)…”
From
teachers refusing to make their classrooms safe for all, to churches condem=
ning
certain segments of our society, to people on the street condemning those t=
hat
are born as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, intersexed, queer, sexually
ambiguous, or just plain different, we might ask, “Where does this ha=
tred
come from?”
It =
comes
from those preaching about our Bible.
You have heard today’s scripture about God talking about
destroying
Gen=
esis
19
The=
two
angels arrived at
But=
he insisted
so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a =
meal
for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate. Before they had gone to bed, all t=
he men
from every part of the city of
But=
the men
inside reached out and pulled
Wha=
t are we
to do with this Biblical text? Some
say that what text is really saying that we must treat the stranger, the
traveler with care and respect because if a traveler, a stranger weren̵=
7;t
taken in while in the desert of that Biblical time, they would surely die.<=
span
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> That is one interpretation. Let’s go back to the beginni=
ng of
this story for a better understanding.
You=
might
remember, earlier in Genesis, strangers/angels visit Abraham and tell Sarah
that she will have children and she laughs because she is so old, in 1 year=
she
has a son. The story goes on =
with
the strangers and God talking and wondering if they should tell Abraham what
they are going to do about
The=
story
goes on that the strangers/the angels tell
But=
the
story doesn’t end there for the daughters worry that their father is
getting old. They are stuck i=
n the
mountains with no men around and therefore cannot have any children to foll=
ow
the law and “preserve the family line.” So they get their father drunk and=
each
sleep with him. They become
pregnant and their sons become the peoples called the Moabites and the Ammo=
nites. Quite a story!
As =
I said
earlier, some have said that there is a misunderstanding of the actual mean=
ing
of the words and that the villagers did not want toy have sex with the
strangers. But there is anoth=
er
story where a similar thing happens.
It is Judges 19: 16-30.
I would not advise any young girls to read this story; for, as a tee=
nager
myself newly “Born Again” and wanting to read and follow the Bi=
ble
cover-to-cover; it gave me nightmares for years. I didn’t even realize =
that
anything was being said about homosexuality because I was so disturbed by t=
he
terrible things that happened to a girl, one that was probably the same age=
as
I was when I read this as a teenager.
These passages are crude and cruel and a part of our Biblical herita=
ge.
From
Judges; An old judge comes into the village square, sees a stranger/a trave=
ler,
and invites him to stay in his home rather than sleep in the square. At night, the men from the village=
come
and want to have sex with this traveler.&n=
bsp;
The old judge says no; take my virgin daughter and the concubine of =
the
stranger instead. The village=
rs would
not listen. So, the judge put=
s the
concubine out the front door. The
villagers rape her and abuse her throughout the night. She survives until daybreak when s=
he
makes her way to the threshold of the house where her master was staying, a=
nd
falls at the threshold.
Let=
me
quote (
The=
y had
intercourse with her and outraged her throughout the night till morning; wh=
en
dawn was breaking they let her go.
At daybreak the girl came and fell on the threshold of her husband=
8217;s
host and she stayed there till it was full day. In the morning the traveler got up=
and
opened the door of the house; he was coming out to continue his journey whe=
n he
saw the woman who had been his concubine lying at the door of the house wit=
h her
hands on the threshold. He sa=
id to
her, ‘Stand up, we must go.’&n=
bsp;
There was no answer. (=
For
she was dead.)
The=
people
mentioned in the story of
Ano=
ther
interpretation of this passage could be that it does not matter the gender =
of
the adult that we intend to have sex with, it has more to do with willingne=
ss
on the part of each person. In
these passages the people on one side of the door intended to commit violen=
ce
on people on the other side of the door.&n=
bsp;
Still, many are hung up on these passages being against
homosexuality.
So,
let’s say that we follow that interpretation of what this passage
says. We would condemn
homosexuality. We would turn =
our
children, our daughters over for torture to protect men. We would have sex slaves or
concubines. If daughters were
childless and without their husbands, they would get their fathers drunk and
have sex with them to continue their lineage as the Bible says. Children would not be considered.<=
span
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> This is what would happen if we wo=
uld
say that we believe in these passages.&nbs=
p;
But=
in
fact, there are practices that the Bible condones that the church rejects
today. The Bible condones the
practice of polygamy. The Bib=
le
condones sex slavery or concubinage.
The Bible condones women as property. The Bible condones slavery. The Bible condones Levirate marria=
ge,
which is if a woman’s husband dies, then her brother-in-law must marry
her and give her children. Th=
ese
are just some of the things that the Bible condones that today’s chur=
ch
rejects.
The=
Bible
also condemns practices that the church now readily accepts. The Bible condemns intercour=
se
during menstruation.
The church does not condemn this.&n=
bsp;
(I don’t think that this is in our by-laws.) The Bible condemns the sin of onan=
ism,
or the practice of non-procreative sex.&nb=
sp;
The church does not. <=
span
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> And the big one, the huge one; the =
Bible
condemns remarriage following divorce; it is very, very clear about this. We can see by the actions of our h=
ighest
church leaders in many denominations, that this is not followed. I would venture a guess that some
sitting right here this morning have remarried after a divorce.
Obv=
iously,
we are not Biblical literalists.
That is, we do not believe that the Bible speaks to us literally.
If =
we have
the ability to decide what passages to follow and what not to follow, how d=
o we
select responsibly? There are=
many
wonderful texts in the Old Testament.
This morning’s text from Micah is one of them.
=
220;This
is what God asks of you:
onl=
y this,
to act justly,
to =
love
tenderly
and=
to walk
humbly with your God.”
I a=
lso
suggest that we look to Jesus as our example. Jesus didn’=
;t
necessarily follow the laws that ALL good Jewish men should follow. In Matthew 12, Jesus and the disci=
ples
pick grain from the field on the Sabbath, because they are hungry, against =
the
law. In Matthew 12:46, Jesus =
denies
his mother and his brothers saying that anyone who does the work of God are=
his
mother and brothers. Jesus didn’t have the traditional family. We certainly can’t say that
Jesus’ parents or the events surrounding his birth are your tradition=
al
Jewish family. Jesus did not,=
by
his example, have a traditional family or follow the laws.
I b=
elieve
that we are called as Christians to follow the Biblical mandate for justice=
and
love. In John
In =
talking
to others about the
Peo=
ple
choose to use a sliver of the Bible to kill others. We know it’s a sliver becaus=
e we
don’t see those that condemn homosexuality following all of the other
laws in this passage or in the Bible.
We don’t see them following Jesus’ new law, “To lo=
ve
one another.”
I h=
ave a
confession to make. Once I wa=
s able
to read the entire story of
My =
faith
and my denomination is where we can say that God is still speaking. God still speaks to each of us.
|
PAGE=
|
&= nbsp; &nbs= p; &= nbsp; &nbs= p; &= nbsp; &nbs= p;